Where you post the job shapes who applies. A project on Fiverr attracts a completely different crowd than the same project on Toptal or Lemon.io, with different experience levels, rates, and vetting. We compared the top 10 freelance marketplaces on reviews, popularity, and talent supply. The rest of the article includes tables comparing hiring experiences and how each marketplace works.

1. Freelancer.com

Freelancer.com is the largest freelance marketplace where you can find experts of all possible profiles. The company claims that 80% of jobs posted on their website receive bids within the first 60 seconds. But to hire senior talent, such as AI engineers or full-stack developers, you’ll need to access their Preferred Freelancer Program, which guarantees pre-vetted experts.

Primary talent regions: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh

Monthly visitors: 4.2M+

Primary visitors share: India (20.1%)

US visitors share: 12.8%

Popularity over time:

Freelancer.com interest over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 4.4 / 5 (19K reviews)

When reading reviews, we noticed a strong imbalance between clients’ and freelancers’ reviews. The latter are mostly satisfied with their experience on the platform. While clients report negative hiring experiences, frequent payment issues, and scam hires with freelancers doing zero of the expected work while taking money for it.

Freelancer.com reviews

2. Upwork

A famous freelance platform that has been particularly active since 2015, where clients can work with freelancers or agencies of all experience levels by posting remote jobs or searching for particular experts by skills, categories, and location. Freelancers bid for jobs they like by buying credits (e.g., 1200 connections can cost over $180 + tax), but often the competition is high, and users need to make 20 or 30 bids before landing a job. To speed up hiring, SMB clients and freelancers can also use Upwork’s custom AI virtual assistant, Uma, for talent matching, proposal writing, or project description creation.

Primary talent regions: Global, especially India, the Philippines, Eastern Europe

Monthly visitors: 35.7M+

Primary visitors share: Pakistan (11.5%), India (11.4%)

US visitors share: 21.5%

Popularity over time:

Upwork popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 4.1 / 5 (13K reviews)

There are too many negative Upwork reviews on Trustpilot. Mostly, they come from freelancers complaining about the company’s policies and slow payment processing. But we’ve also seen customers rant about high fees, refund issues, and poor customer service. Explore more Upwork alternatives, apart from what’s listed in this article.

Upwork reviews

3. Lemon.io

Even though we don’t focus on sourcing freelance work, Lemon.io is a reliable source for hiring senior pre-vetted developers with 3+ years of proven commercial experience. We rely on a multi-stage vetting process and accept only the top 1% Central/Eastern/Northern European engineers, as well as specialists from Latin America. We take time to interview every engineer to verify their hard and soft skills, and yet ensure a match within 24–48 business hours.

You can (and are encouraged to) sign an NDA with a freelancer you hire from Lemon.io. All the communication and project data transfers between you and the contractor are direct, so none of the information you exchange with them is stored on Lemon.io’s servers.

Primary talent regions: CEE, Canada, the UK, the US, and Latin America

Monthly visitors: 174K+

Primary visitors share: US (13.04%), India (11.08%)

Popularity over time:

Lemon.io popularity over time

Reviews

Trustliot score: 4.8 / 5 (313 reviews)

Lemon.io has overwhelmingly positive reviews on Trustpilot (90% 5-star reviews). Our devs and clients honor exceptional customer support, a respectful attitude, and a strong product mindset. Negative reviews mention AI features still in progress, developers whose communication gaps only showed up once the project started, and non-engineering applicants slipping through.

Lemon.io review

4. Behance

Founded in 2005, Behance is a freelance network with over 50 million members. It’s best-suited for finding web designers, video editors, illustrators, graphic designers, and other creators. A core distinctive feature of this platform is the possibility to browse creators’ portfolios and reach out to them directly without bidding. The platform is supported by Adobe and praises creators skilled with Adobe Creative Cloud. 

Primary talent regions: Asia-Pacific (APAC), Europe, the Americas

Monthly visitors: 32.9M+

Primary visitors share: India (12.7%)

US visitors share: 8%

Popularity over time: 

Behance popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 1.7 / 5 (41 reviews)

Most of the positive reviews are two or even five years old, which indicates that the platform has gradually declined in quality despite a relatively stable search interest illustrated above. Recent negative reviews mention poor customer service and bad payment processing. One of the reviewers named the platform: “Adobe’s long forgotten project that they don’t care about.”

Behance review

5. Contra

Founded during COVID times in 2020, when the hiring approach started shifting to remote and skill-first. Its founder, Ben Huffman, built a zero-commission model where freelancers keep 100% of their earnings. The platform has raised $45M in funding and, by early 2024, had built a network of over 1.5 million creative freelancers and 20,000 clients. It covers design, engineering, marketing, and writing. The platform’s unique AI product, Contra Labs, is using its freelancer network to help train AI models on human taste. It can also connect AI companies with vetted creative professionals.

Primary talent regions: North America, Western/Eastern/Northern Europe, 

Monthly visitors: 1.6M+

Primary visitors share: US (14.33%)

Popularity over time:

Contra popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 2.5 / 5 (51 reviews)

With over half of negative reviews on Trustpilot, users are mostly dissatisfied with customer support, a limited number of jobs, and payment issues (specifically for clients). Freelancers keep 100% of what they earn. Clients often flag the payment fees, up to $29 per transaction, on top of standard processing charges.

Contra review

6. PeoplePerHour

Founded in 2007 in the UK, PeoplePerHour is a trusted generalist freelance marketplace for content writing, voice-over, SEO, website development, logo design, and many other categories. You can search for the right candidate manually or use Phoenix, an AI matching service. PeoplePerHour combines two hiring models: post a project and receive proposals from freelancers, or browse “hourlies”, pre-packaged services listed at a fixed price, ranging from $20 to $1,500, depending on the project type.

Primary talent regions: The UK and Western Europe

Monthly visitors: 1.15M+

Primary visitors share: India (15.97%)

US visitors share: 6.8%

Popularity over time:

PeoplePerHour popularity over time

Reviews

G2 score: 4.0 / 5 (97 reviews)

Users highlight how effortless it is to find eligible freelancers and clients on the platform. However, some customers also point out the high fees, a lack of timely customer support, and technical issues.

PeoplePerHour review

7. Freelancermap

On Freelancermap, you get direct access to freelancers categorized by location, skills, salary, current availability, and even their willingness to travel. The platform has existed since 2005 and mostly targets German-speaking freelancers and clients from the DACH region. But there are also freelancers from Latin America, Africa, and CEE. As for projects, the platform currently has more than 900 mostly on-site jobs in its project catalog.

Primary talent regions: Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Indonesia, India

Monthly visitors: 270K+

Primary visitors share: Indonesia (22.9%), Germany (11.04%)

US visitors share: 3.9%

Popularity over time:

Freelancermap popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 4.3 / 5 (399 reviews)

With more than 70% of 5-star reviews, this platform equally satisfies freelancers and clients. But some users complain about the ineffective vetting process.

Freelancermap review

8. Useme

Useme is a Europe-based freelance service with an open database of a global talent pool (e.g., 3K+ programmers in the coding and IT category). A simple interface with a clear, intuitive UI/UX only supports the platform’s positioning as a formalities-free marketplace. Useme Club members go through a vetting process, which makes them more trusted by clients and better positioned to land higher-value projects.

Primary talent regions: Poland, Eastern Europe

Monthly visitors: 400K+

Primary visitors share: Poland (70.2%), the UK (2.6%)

US visitors share: 3.07%

Popularity over time:

Useme popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 4.2 / 5 (1.1K reviews)

User experience is mostly positive, with more than 80% of 5-star reviews on Trustpilot. The most common concerns are regarding payment issues. The platform claims to serve 170+ countries, but Poland dominates in both traffic and invoice processing.

Useme review

9. 99Designs

99Designs is the right choice when you need a logo, graphic design, web design, animations, book cover design, or complete corporate identity for your startup or SMB. Unlike Behance, which skews toward portfolio showcasing and Adobe users, 99Designs gives you access to a global pool of designers across specializations. On top of that, the platform has built-in project management and escrow services.

Primary talent regions: Asia-Pacific (APAC), Europe, the Americas

Monthly visitors: 2M+

Primary visitors share: Indonesia (26.09%), India (16.2%)

US visitors share: 13.2%

Popularity over time:

99Designs popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 4.2 / 5 (1.5K reviews)

99Designs reviews on Trustpilot and G2 Crowd are mostly positive. Customers agree that the platform can deliver decent results for reasonable prices, although you should not expect anything extraordinary. Users also report that designers often submit AI-generated work. That’s why the platform could do with an AI content validation layer.

99Design review

10. Gun.io

An engineers-only marketplace that vets senior devs and matches them with suitable projects. India and the US are the top hiring and talent countries. The platform serves startups, SMBs, and enterprises. Apart from the rigorous vetting process, the company also offers software engineer onboarding and work quality oversight to ensure that the clients are 100% satisfied with the result.

Primary talent regions: North America, Latin America

Monthly visitors: 109K+

Primary visitors share: India (17.8%)

US visitors share: 11.5%

Popularity over time:

Gun.io popularity over time

Reviews

G2 score: 4.5 / 5 (16 reviews)

Users on Trustpilot are mostly dissatisfied with the platform due to unexpected account blocking or unreliable customer support. On G2, clients had more pleasant experiences with the platform, with some minor communication issues.

Gun.io review

11. Fiverr

Fiverr is a marketplace specializing in quick side-hustles and same-day tasks. Customers can work with a vetting partner to quickly find the right freelancer or use Fiverr NEO, an AI matching service. Currently, the platform offers AI video director roles as a separate service for AI-powered cinematic commercials, video editing, and UGC content creation. Fiverr also has a business solution pack for clients who need off-the-shelf services, such as ClearVoice for end-to-end content creation and management or Digis for custom software development.

Primary talent regions: The US, India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Eastern Europe, and Africa

Monthly visitors: 36.6M+

Primary visitors share: Pakistan (12.8%)

US visitors share: 24.8%

Popularity over time:

Fiverr popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 2.5 / 5 (14K reviews)

Lots of negative reviews mention poor customer support. Also, some mention user accounts being suspended or blocked for no obvious reason. Positive reviews mostly come from customers satisfied with the freelancers’ creative skills.

Fiverr review

12. Codeable

Codeable is a niche platform for WordPress website developers founded in 2012 in Denmark, with 500+ pre-screened specialists. Each profile shows ratings, experience, skills, and completed web development projects. You can get a free estimate before committing, and clients often return to the same developer for ongoing work. The platform serves everyone from solopreneurs to enterprises and e-commerce store owners.

Primary talent regions: The US, the UK, Canada, and Western Europe

Monthly visitors: 100K+

Primary visitors share: Canada (11.4%)

US visitors share: 27.3%

Popularity over time:

Codeable popularity over time

Reviews

Trustpilot score: 4.7 / 5 (946 reviews)

Codeable reviews usually praise the quality of the services its freelancers provide and the prompt response from the support team. Negative Codeable reviews often mention missed deadlines or refund issues (40% from the initial payment). 

Codeable review

Marketplace Model Comparison

Platform

Pricing

Open or Closed Talent Pool

Bidding

Vetting Level

Freelancer.com

Companies:
For fixed price projects, a fee of 3% or $3; for hourly projects, a fee of 3%/each payment

Freelancers:
Free, but a minimum balance of $20 for bidding

Open

Yes

Low

Upwork

Companies:
Basic: 5% fee; Business Plus: 10% fee
Custom enterprise plans

Freelancers:
Free basic features; freelancer Plus: $19,99 per/mo

Mostly Open

Yes (Connects system)

Low

PeoplePerHour

Fixed prices on pre-packed projects (from $20 to $1,500); direct freelance hires on an hourly basis

Open

Partial

Low–Moderate

Freelancermap

Companies:
Business: €59 per/mo
Enterprise: €89 per/mo

Freelancers:
Free basic features; premium: €13.99 per/mo

Mostly Open

Partial

Low–Moderate

Useme

4.99% service fee, but never more than €99 per/mo

Open

Yes

Low

Contra

Free for basic features; Pro: $199/year ($29 per/mo)

Open

No

Low–Moderate

Behance

Free basic features for creators; Pro: $11.99 per/mo, with a free 7-day trial; Clients hire freelancers directly on an hourly or project basis

Open

No

Low

99Designs

Design contests and direct hiring from $100 for simple logo designs to $5000 for a full brand pack

Semi-Closed

Contest-based bidding

Moderate

Lemon.io

$25–75/hr typical rates

Open

No

Very High

Gun.io

Flexible custom packages for freelancers; 20% of the first year’s salary for hiring employees

Closed

No

High

Fiverr

Free access to global talent
Fiverr Pro Advanced for $129 per/mo

Open

No (predefined gigs)

Low

Codeable

Pricing depends on project complexity, urgency, and scope, and can range from $900 to $15K+

Closed

No

Very High

Sources: Company websites, Trustpilot

Hiring Experience Comparison

Platform

You Search Candidates

Platform Matches Candidates

Typical Time to Hire

Freelancer.com

Yes

No

Hours to weeks

Upwork

Yes

Partial AI recommendations

Hours to weeks

Freelancermap

Yes

Limited

Days to weeks

PeoplePerHour

Yes

AI matching available

Hours to days

Useme

Yes

No

Days

Contra

Yes

AI recommendations

Hours to days

Behance

Yes

No

Hours to days

99Designs

Designers compete via contests

No

Days

Lemon.io

No

Yes

Usually within 24 hours

Gun.io

No

Yes

24–72 hours

Fiverr

Yes (browse gigs)

Algorithm recommendations

Minutes to days

Codeable

No

Yes

Usually <24 hours

Source: Company websites

Key Takeaways

    • Marketplace size doesn’t necessarily translate into hiring efficiency. Open platforms such as Upwork, Fiverr, and Freelancer.com provide the most candidate volume, but users frequently report spending significant time reviewing proposals, filtering applicants, and validating skills before making a hire.

    • Generalist marketplaces dominate traffic, while specialized platforms compete through focus. Platforms such as Upwork, Fiverr, and Freelancer.com serve nearly every freelance category, whereas Codeable, 99designs, Lemon.io, and Gun.io narrow their scope to specific professions or talent segments.

    • Vetting has become the main differentiator among freelance platforms. Curated networks such as Lemon.io, Gun.io, and Codeable trade marketplace scale for pre-screened talent, faster matching, and reduced hiring risk.

    • Pricing generally follows vetting intensity. Open marketplaces tend to offer the lowest entry costs, while curated talent networks command higher rates in exchange for stronger screening, higher talent quality, and less time spent evaluating candidates.

    • Lemon.io delivers one of the fastest hiring experiences in the comparison, matching startups and SMBs with vetted software developers from CEE, North America, the UK, and Latin America, with most clients receiving candidate introductions within 24–48 business hours.

    • Across almost all platforms, the most common user complaints are remarkably similar: customer support responsiveness, payment-related issues, and inconsistent freelancer quality, highlighting the trade-off between marketplace openness and quality control.