How does Tailwind CSS compare to Materialize for responsive design?

Materialize and Tailwind CSS differ in their responsive designs. Tailwind, as a utility-first framework, uses responsive utility classes that give the developer control of styles under different breakpoints, for example, ‘sm:’, ‘md:’, ‘lg’:. The above syntax gives detailed control over responsive behavior and makes it easy to create custom mobile-first designs without predefined layouts. In contrast, following Material Design principles, Materialize uses responsive components that help create a consistent, Google-inspired aesthetic. It allows for fast and easy implementation of standard, consistently styled UIs with less room for custom designs. Generally, Tailwind is preferred when high customization in responsiveness and unique layouts are required, while Materialize is better suited to projects requiring a professional and consistent look and feel right from the start, aligned with Material Design.